![]() Some US allies abuse the access they have been granted to try to clandestinely collect critical information that they can use for their own economic or political advantage. Industrial spies dont only come from other businesses, they can be from the inside too, which is what makes industrial espionage such a difficult and. It gives an overview of the concepts of competitive intelligence and corporate espionage and examines the differences between them. ![]() But the world of corporate spying has plenty of drama, too. China and Russia are our most aggressive and capable adversaries using economic espionage.Ĭhina and Russia are not the only perpetrators of espionage against sensitive US economic information and technology. The case discusses the corporate espionage controversy involving two of the world''s largest consumer product companies, Procter & Gamble (P&G) and Unilever, in the early 21st century. May 30th 2022 F or espionage of the cloak-and-dagger variety, it is hard to beat John le Carré or Ian Fleming. The requirement to move quickly and unabashedly leaves American companies vulnerable as they flock into spy-rich developing nations. American companies are driven into developing markets by shareholders, growth ambitions, and the desire to beat Wall Street's quarterly earnings expectations. The second CI challenge is tied to the nature of public corporations. CI measures absorb company resources that would otherwise be used for growth. This is in large part because counterintelligence is not a typical corporate function, even for well-trained and well–staffed security professionals.Ĭounterintelligence is a challenge for corporations for two reasons. The private sector alone lacks the resources and expertise to thwart foreign efforts to steal critical American know-how. Without corrective action that mobilizes the expertise of both the Federal Government and the private sector, the technologies cultivated by American minds and within American universities are at risk of becoming the plunder of competing nations at the expense of long-term U.S. Espionage against the private sector increases the danger to long-term U.S. Their efforts compromise intellectual property, trade secrets, and technological developments that are critical to national security. ![]() These adversaries use traditional intelligence tradecraft against vulnerable American companies, and they increasingly view the cyber environment-where nearly all important business and technology information now resides-as a fast, efficient, and safe way to penetrate the foundations of our economy. Today, foreign intelligence services, criminals, and private sector spies are focused on American industry and the private sector. Nazi spies during World War II tried to penetrate the secrets behind our aviation technology, just as Soviet spies in the Cold War targeted our nuclear and other military secrets. They frequently avoid using standing armies, shirk traditional spy circles, and go after the heart of what drives American prosperity and fuels American might.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |